Skip to Content

Churches Resources

Articles, Blogs, and News

Should Christian Groups Accept Government Grant Funding

Of course, this is a decision each Christian organization will need to make based on their mission, vision, calling, and leading.  There is no single answer or right answer for all Christian organizations.

 

The decision, in my opinion, should also not be any different under the Obama administration than it was under the Bush administration.

 

There were a number of organizations that got into legal trouble under the Bu
Read more

An Introduction to Systemic Theology

Executive Director Andrew Sears outlines a new branch of theology called "Systemic Theology", which provides a systems perspective on the world and God that prioritizes holistic ministry and justice.

Read more

The Value of Partnership

 
      COLLABORATION RESOURCE
The Value of Partnership

 

By Dr. Phill W. Butler (PowerOfCONNECTING.net)

 

Resource Type: This resource is a power point presentation about the value of partnerships among ministries. It covers a range of topics, starting with the biblical basis for partnership and addressing such issues and questions as: the definition of partnership, what is required in a partnership, the benefits of partnership, why partnership is necessary, and the difficulties and cost of partnership.  

 

Main Audience: This resource is good for both pastors and lay leaders interested in developing a partnership.  Some experience may be necessary to understand all of the material presented in this power point.  Although this presentation is directed for beginners, some of the language used may be difficult to understand from the slides alone.

 

 

 

Related Articles
Profile of LifeBridge Christian Church

Core Ideas on Partnership

A Survey for Evaluating Collaborative Relationships

Related Books
Collaboration: What Makes it Work?


News
Conference Calendar
Forum
Find Others
Ask a Specialist

 

Read more

Personality

PERSONALITY

Instructions:

God uses all personality types to build His kingdom. There is no right or wrong temperament. The personality traits listed below are grouped in four couplets each with two opposing tendencies.

Read more

Faith Has a Limited Effect on Most People’s Behavior

 

The Barna Research Group, Ltd. (May 24, 2004). “Faith Has a Limited Effect on Most People’s Behavior.” The Barna Group, Ventura California, pp. 3

 

OVERVIEW

In this research, The Barna Group surveyed adults in the US to gauge whether one’s religious beliefs have an actual effect on the some of the life choices they make. The findings, listed in more detail below, suggest that for many people their personal faith has little effect on what lifestyle choices they make from day to day. Those is the largest two groups, notional Christians and non-evangelical born again Christians, showed very little consistency on what behaviors were engaged in and which were avoided. However, two groups do go against these trends: Christian evangelicals and those without a faith preference. These two categories did emerge as a group of people who’s belief system did affect their choices.

DESIGN

This research was the result of a nationwide telephone survey in May of 2003. About 1,000 adults from throughout the 48 continental states were randomly selected by The Barna Group to be interviewed, and their locations reflect the geographic distribution of the US population. The survey related people’s faith and nineteen lifestyle activities that were defined as ones that may be affected by one’s beliefs.

FINDINGS

They sorted their respondents into five faith categories. The largest (at one third of the adult population) are deemed “notional Christians”, who are adults who say they are Christians but have never made a profession in Jesus Christ. The second largest are called “non-evangelical born again Christians”, those who have accepted Christ as savior but do not necessarily ascribe to the idea of Biblical inerrancy, believe that God as creator and current ruler of the world, share their faith with others, etc. The next group was “atheists/agnostics”, or those without a faith preference. “Evangelical Christians” represented 7% of the population, and they are characterized by a belief in the accuracy of the Bible, a compulsion to share their faith with others, and declare that their faith plays an important role in their faith. The remaining group was the “adherents of non-Christian faiths” such as Islam, Buddhism or Scientology).

The question of whether someone, or a group’s, personal faith made a difference in some typical moral/life choices depended on which group the interviewer tended to fall into. In general, among most groups, one’s personal beliefs made little difference on their engagement in any of the nineteen “lifestyle activities” used by the survey. The survey found that, in particular, being part of the non-evangelical born again Christian group, the notional Christian group, or the adherents of non-Christian faiths predicted very little about how one would answer the 19 questions. In these cases, especially among the notional and non-evangelical born again Christians, one’s faith seemed to have little to do with one’s life.

On the other hand, two groups in particular (evangelicals representing 7% of the population and atheists/agnostics representing 12% of the population) did in fact show a likelihood toward certain activities. These two groups, more than any others, did appear to affect their lifestyles. “There is a strong connections between the faith views and practices of evangelicals and their lifestyles.” (p.1)

Evangelical Christians were the most likely to:

  • Attend church, pray, and read the Bible
  • Discuss spiritual matters with other people
  • Volunteer (church-related or non-profit)
  • Discuss political matters with people
  • Discuss moral issues and conditions with others
  • Stop watching a TV program due to content
  • Go out of their way to encourage others

Evangelicals were also much less likely to view pornographic material, read their horoscopes, use tobacco products, or contact their political official.

The other group that stood out was those with no religious faith. Atheists and agnostics were most likely to:

  • Recycle
  • Visit an adult-only website
  • View pornography
  • Get drunk
  • Have sexual intercourse with someone to whom they are not married

This group was also the least likely to volunteer at a church/non-profit, turn off the television due to values espoused, fast for religious reasons, or do 30 minutes of exercise in the past week.

 

QUESTIONS FOR REFLECTIONS AND DISCUSSION

  1. In what ways does your belief in God affect the way in which you act every day? Do you make different choices based on your religious beliefs?
  2. How would your past week have been different if you made lifestyle choices based on what we are taught in the Bible?
  3. Why do you think that the findings show that non-evangelical or born-again Christians are less affected by their beliefs that evangelical Christians?
  4. Why do you think there are some “good” behaviors, such as recycling or contacting elected officials, were not practiced often by those evangelicals who they interviewed?
  5. How can we encourage those around us to live a life worthy of our beliefs and our callings as children of God?

 

IMPLICATIONS

  1. Our beliefs should have an effect on the way we live our lives day to day, but they do not always do that. We can do great good and great harm to our Christian witness depending on the way we live our lives. Our beliefs should make a difference.
  2. In the report, George Barna suggests that families should integrate the practice of living what you believe early into the lives of children. :We have found that unless outh children are taught how to tie their beliefs into their daily behavior, he chances of faith ever influencing their lifestyle in significant ways is slim.”
  3. The world is watching – we need to show we are Christians by our lives – by our love for God, the world and all people.

Rebecca Wolfe cCYS

A discussion on church racial reconciliation

 

A discussion on church racial reconciliation.

 

A cooperative plan between two churches of differing ethnicity (white and black) to seek true Christian racial reconciliation, a “calling higher than social equality,” using the outline of More Than Equals by Spencer Perkins and Chris Rice. (review)

 

 

OVERVIEW

 

(Download Racial Reconciliation discussion as a PDF)

 

The church in America has long suffered from divisions between the races.  This has been intentional in some cities and has been the result of simple neglect in others.  Perkins and Rice argue for the church’s role in achieving what secular American society has not been able to achieve and they offer a three step method to get there.  This series of meetings and discussions will utilize many of More Than Equals’ insights to further the cause of reconciliation in the church and can be used in any community.  It will also be based on Pastor Edward Gaskin’s philosophy that “revelation must precede reconciliation.” (The word Revelation below will refer back to this principle.)

 

 

 

LEADER PREPARATION

 

1.     Pastors (or representatives) from each church will read More Than Equals to get familiar with the outline and some of the principal issues.  (Allow one month to read and absorb.)

2.     Pastors will get together to discuss book and the goals of the church’s ministry of reconciliation to each other.  (Allow one afternoon – 3 to 4 hours)

3.     Pastors will spend time in prayer together for the success of their efforts.  (As long as it takes.)

4.     Pastors will spend time getting to know one another on a personal basis.  (Dinners or other events to develop a working relationship with an eye to greater intimacy.)

5.     Pastors will agree on a schedule for the various meetings and work together to develop the outline and plans for the ministry.  (A few meetings to prepare this.)

 

 

 

 

SESSIONS (5 Planned Initially)

 

 

A.    First Session:  Introductions (name only) will be made by all the members of both churches.  (We will gather at the white church for this first session.  Allow three hours. Revelation)

1.     Topics to Cover:

a.      The purposes behind our future meetings:

i.        To seek first understanding of each other within our American and Christian contexts. (revelation)

ii.      To seek to overcome racial hurts and disappointments and grow in unity. (reconciliation)

b.     The resources we will use during our gatherings:

i.        More Than Equals by Spencer Perkins and Chris Rice (give history of these men and the basic outline of the book.)

ii.      Bible with specific references to the issues of unity and justice.

c.      Go over the basic outline of our three sessions from More Than Equals:

i.        Second Session will cover:  Admit “that the race problem exists and that our inability to deal with race has weakened the credibility of our gospel.”

ii.  Third Session will cover:  Submit “to one another, white to black and black to white.”

iii.    Fourth Session will cover:  Commit “to seek ways to make a difference.”

d.     Allow time for feedback with questions and concerns.  Place concerns within the context of the next four sessions so that the participants can see that their concerns will be addressed, but in order, so that each step will build upon the last one.

 

 

B.     Second SessionAdmit:  We will spend this session considering the many facets of the problem of racism faced by our society and our churches.  (We will gather at the black church for this session.  Allow three hours.  Revelation)

1.     Topics to Cover:

a.      Race Fatigue” – chapter 23:  The basic problem as we see it addressing the fact that we are all hurt by this problem.  Pastors will lead this discussion looking at a history of the problem. 

b.     “Black Residue” – chapter 7:  Black Christians will address some of these issues: anger and blame; self-doubt, etc.  They will also share what it means to them to be black in America.  We are seeking to arrive at the basic level of the beliefs of this group about their situation and about white people.

c.      “White Blinders” – chapter 5:  In what ways is the white community unaware of the problems of black Christians.  The white pastor will address such issues as:  “where was your starting line?,” the dominant European culture, statistics on “white flight,” “white privilege,” etc.  We are seeking to make the white Christians aware of many of the blinders we have, but have never considered.

d.     “White Fear” – chapter 14:  White Christians will have an opportunity to share their own concerns and views of black people in America.  We are seeking to arrive at the basic level of the beliefs of this group about black people.

e.      Period of discussion.  While questions will be permitted during each of these segments, a time will be given at the end for questions and feedback.

 

 

 

 

C.     Third SessionSubmit:  We will spend this session considering our common heritage as believers and deciding to submit to each other for the sake of our unity.  (We will gather at the white church for this session.  Allow three hours.  Revelation)

1.     Topics to Cover:

a.      “Weapons for the Battle” – chapter 11:  We will consider the weapons God has given us to heal ourselves and each other from the wounds of racism: forgiveness, the Word, perseverance, Jesus, the Holy Spirit.

b.     “Acts: A Reconciliation Story” – chapter 12:  We will look at Scriptural accounts of racial reconciliation:  Acts 6 (Grecian Jews vs. Hebraic Jews); Acts 8 (the Samaritans); Acts 15 (the Gentile question).  We will grow in faith that it is possible to overcome what seems insurmountable by looking at God’s successful reconciliation in Scripture.

c.      We will call each other to mutual submission as we seek to let the Spirit of God empower us to move on to the commitment stage.

d.     We will offer a time of discussion to address any left over or unresolved issues from our previous session.

 

 

D.    Fourth SessionCommit:  We will spend this session looking at ways that we might all make a difference as the church.  (We will gather at the black church for this session.  Allow three hours.  Revelation)

1.     Topics to Cover:

a.      “The Character of a Reconciler” – chapter 13:  We will look at the following issues surrounding who we need to be in order to be reconcilers in our communities:  one who “confronts racial conflict,” “making the choice for unity,” the “path to corporate reconciliation,”

b.     “Kingdom Choices” – chapter 18:  We will consider the fact that we are a part of the kingdom of God and thus we have the responsibility to make choices pleasing to God.  We will consider: being “intentional” about developing relationships with people of the opposite race, taking “small steps of faithfulness,” seeking “unlikely relationships” and committing to continue the learning process.

c.      Homework Assignment:  Participants are to come back for the following session with a “Personal Plan for Reconciliation.”  This plan should include the following three sections:

i.        Admit:  Participants will prepare to acknowledge any previously held beliefs about the other race that they now realize were wrong due to ignorance or racist tendencies.  The participant should prepare to verbally state what areas those were, why they held them and that they now understand and believe otherwise.

ii.      Submit:  Participants will prepare to demonstrate mutual submission by seeking forgiveness from one another for previously held racist beliefs.  They may seek out individuals or address the other group as a whole.  This would be a good time ask for and received forgiveness from each other.

iii.    Commit:  Participants will have a list of six items demonstrating their commitment to being agents of healing and reconciliation.  The first three on the list should be things they plan to do within the next month and the other three are things to be done over their lifetime.

 

 

E.     Fifth Session:  Reconciliation Meeting  (We will gather at the white church for this session.  Allow four hours.  Reconciliation)

  1. Description of Meeting:  The participants will now fully engage each other in seeking, offering and receiving forgiveness.

1.     Admit:  Participants will now acknowledge any previously held beliefs about the other race that they now realize were wrong due to ignorance or racist tendencies.  The participant will verbally state what areas those were, why they held them and that they now understand and believe otherwise.

2.     Submit:  Participants will demonstrate mutual submission by seeking forgiveness from one another for previously held racist beliefs.  They may seek out individuals or address the other group as a whole.

3.     Commit:  Participants will share their list of six items demonstrating their commitment to being agents of healing and reconciliation.

 

 

 

GROUP BUILDING


The following is a potential group building exercise for the beginning of each session listed above. 

Answer the following question:

  • Session 1:  What is your favorite thing about being (white, black)?

  • Session 2:  What is the greatest burden you face because you are (white, black)?

  • Session 3:  When did you first realize that being (white, black) was an advantage?

  • Session 4:  When did you first realize that being (white, black) was a disadvantage?

  • Session 5:  What is the thing you learned about being (white, black) in America that you are most surprised by?

 

 

 

GROUP PRESENTATION


We will introduce the issues for each evening in a variety of ways.  Each session will have it’s own introduction as follows:

  • Session 1:  Film clip of “A Class Divided”

  • Session 2:  Film clip of “Eyes on the Prize:  The Civil Rights Years”

  • Session 3:  Film clip of “Acts” focusing on either Acts 6, 8 or 15. (Thomas Nelson)

  • Session 4:  Film clip of “Matthew” focusing on chapter 5:1-24 (Beatitudes)

  • Session 5:  Worship together.

  •  

  •  

 

GROUP DISCUSSION


Group discussion will occur within each session based upon the topic for the evening.  Questions will be generated from the materials to be covered from More Than Equals and presented by the facilitator for that evening.  When the meetings occur in the black church, the white pastor will facilitate and when they occur in the white church, the black pastor will facilitate.  (There is “home turf,” but no “home field advantage.”)  Possible  questions for each session:

  • Session 1:  What are your expectations for this endeavor?  Are you optimistic or pessimistic in your assessment of the potential for true Christian reconciliation?

  • Session 2:  How will admitting the facts of racism help us to overcome racism?  What usually hinders us from admitting the truth wherever we find it? 

  • Session 3:  What are the risks inherent in submitting to another person?  What is the world’s/church’s stance toward submission?

  • Session 4:  Why do people fear commitment?  What are your fears about committing to one another in this setting?

  • Session 5:  There is no real discussion in session 5.  The participants will be actively engaging one another.

 

 

 

WRAP-UP


We will conclude each session with the following thoughts:

  • Session 1:  As you think about what you’ve heard tonight, and looking forward to next session, consider areas you may need to admit personal racism.

  • Session 2:  As you’ve heard various people admit personal beliefs tonight, consider how you feel about submitting to one another when we come back for the next session.

  • Session 3:  Now that you’ve chosen to submit to one another, we want you to think about the level of commitment you are willing to make to each other.

  • Session 4:  Having committed to a process of reconciliation, consider carefully your assignment to plan a life of reconciliation.

  • Session 5:  Now that we have fully engaged one another in this process of reconciliation, take this with you and glorify God through the unity the church has long needed.

 

 

 

EVALUATION AND FOLLOW-UP


Ideas for reinforcement of the commitment for future growth by the participants:

·         Share your “Personal Plan for Reconciliation” with your spouse or closest friend and elicit their commitment to work with you toward being a reconciler.

·         Make the commitment to develop relationship with at least one of the participants from the other church with whom you can partner in being reconcilers in your community.

·         Seek to communicate with members of your church who were not able to attend what you have learned and how you have grown as a result of these meetings.

·         Keep a journal of your progress and share this with someone significant to you.

 

·         Take the initiative in leading a program similar to the one you have just been through, either with new members of the same churches or in another context, such as youth in the church or for your community at large.

 

 

 

 

IMPLICATIONS


The success of this program is vital for the health of any church in any community.  Because the church has for so long ignored this issue, society around us does not see us as a reconciling community.  Therefore, when we speak of reconciliation between God and man, they do not understand this as an important issue because they don’t see human reconciliation in action around them.  Once we demonstrate reconciliation between races, people will see its possibility and perhaps even, the power of God in seemingly impossible human divisions. Not only would this demonstrate God’s ability to reconcile, but it would show the church’s relevance to modern society.  Our failure to be reconcilers makes us look impotent in the face of the greatest crisis facing our culture.

 

 

If young people, parents, teachers, youth leaders and pastors could utilize a program like this, we will see far greater success in bringing the churches in our communities to unity.

Various groups in our community (ministries, educational institutions and helping professionals) could adapt such a program to their particular context.  Other churches in the community might also host this program for their organizations using those who have already been through it. Through the process, they would produce the best-suited working model for reconciliation in their situation.  

 

 

Scott Braithwaite cCYS


Spirituals: Pentecost betweek black and white

Hollenweger, W. The songs of the blacks. From Hollenweger, W. (1974). Pentecost between black and white, pp. 22-24. Belfast, Ireland: Christian Journals Ltd.

OVERVIEW

ORIGIN AND FUNCTION OF NEGRO SPIRITUALS

The author, Professor of Missions at the University of Birmingham, England, provides the following summary of various conflicting and overlapping opinions:

  • The spiritual has been seen as a misinterpreted hymn of the white church. (G.P. Jackson)
  • The spiritual should be seen as a ‘confession of faith’ of the black church. (S. Lauchli and Th. Lehmann)
  • The spiritual is the "clearest exponent of the Negro’s real self." (H.W. Odum)
  • The spiritual can be interpreted as an oral document of events in the history of the American Negro. (M.M. Fisher)
  • The spiritual was a protest against social injustice. (J. Lovell)
  • The spiritual was an adaptation of African songs. (H.E. Krehbiel and Du Bois)
  • Spirituals were songs originating in the white revival movement. (B.T. Washington)
  • Spirituals were the musical creations of black bards like "singing Johnson" and "Ma White." (J.W. Johnson)
  • Spirituals represent a blending of American and European melodies with African rhythm. (E.M. von Horbostel).

INFLUENCE: MUSICAL PRODUCTS OF SPIRITUALS

Hollenweger says that though their history may be somewhat obscure, their effects upon music trends are clear. They produced or had a profound influence on

  • Different styles of jazz, including the Blues.
  • Music in white Pentecostal churches—taking black style and changing and adapting to white style.
  • Spontaneous gospel music arising from Pentecostal and some black Baptists churches.
  • Attempts to adapt spirituals to European and American traditional church music.

Debate has risen in regards to this fourth category. Is it ever appropriate to use the spiritual in a non-Black church service?

MEMORY OF BLACK PAST

Hardly controversial is the fact that spirituals in some way ensure the memory of an oral African American culture. James Cone, in "Black Spirituals: A Theological Interpretation," Theology Today, 29(1), April 1972, pp. 54-69 [see also his The Spirituals and The Blues, 1972], says of Negro spirituals:

The divine liberation of the oppressed from slavery is the central theological concept in the black spirituals. These songs show that black slaves did not believe that human servitude was reconcilable with their African past and their knowledge of the…gospel. They did not believe that God created Africans to be the slaves of Europeans. Accordingly they sang of a God who was involved in their history—their history—making right what whites have made wrong...And if ‘de God dat lived in Moses’ time is jes’ de same today’, then God will vindicate the suffering of the righteous blacks and punish the unrighteous whites for their wrongdoings.

QUESTIONS FOR REFLECTION AND DISCUSSION

  1. How have you enjoyed spirituals, if you have, and how much have you understood their nature and origin?
  2. Which of the eight explanations of the origins of spirituals seems most adequate to you?
  3. Do you think Cone goes too far in his interpretation of Negro spirituals?
  4. Do you think that "Follow the Drinking Gourd" might have meant following the Little Dipper and North Star to freedom, or that "Swing Low, Sweet Chariot" could have had anything to do with the underground railroad?
  5. What do you see as the place of these spirituals in black churches today? In white churches or places of worship?
  6. Where do we go from here? Is there need for greater knowledge and instruction about music and experiences of African Americans? Is there still work to be done in the relationships of blacks and whites?

IMPLICATIONS

  • Music is one of the great influences in a young person’s life, and should be a universal means of communication among us all. Our musical tastes, just like the spectrum of our relationships, need to be stretched. We are enriched when our appreciation of our own and other cultures includes an interest in the music of others and times past.
  • The sentimentalizing of spirituals merely for the purpose musical variety would seem to do injustice to this powerful musical tradition.
  • One of the many functions of music is a prophetic one; it would seem that spirituals both comforted and challenged its original singers. It is too bad that those who should have been confronted by powerful messages took so long to notice and understand.

Dean Borgman cCYS

To determine how adults view the participation of young people in their church

 

To determine how adults view the participation of young people in their church.

OVERVIEW

ADULT QUESTIONNAIRE

We appreciate your cooperation in this survey. The questionnaires are anonymous, and confidentiality is assured. We hope you will be able to compare your collective adult responses to those of the youth in your church and responses elsewhere around the country. Feel free to omit any information you do not care to give.

1. How would you assess the presence and participation of young people in your church?

a) good
b) average
c) poor



2. How would you like to see the youth more involved
(specify)?________________________________

3. What do you think young people like most about church?

a) the music
b) the sermons
c) prayer
d) their friends
e) other (specify)_____________________________



4. What do you think young folks want most from church?

a) encouragement
b) challenge
c) peer support
d) personal attention from adults
e) religious or spiritual information or instruction



5. In what way is the religious faith of our youth weakest?

a) in the clarity of their commitment
b) in their ability to share their faith with friends
c) in the integration of faith and ethics
d) in their knowledge of doctrine and the Bible
e) in their appreciation of their own church tradition
f) in their understanding of worship



6. What percentage (consider how many out of ten and make into a round number, 10%, 20% 30%, etc.) of high school youth in your town:

____ go to church or religious function once a week
____ have a job
____ have cheated in the past on school work
____ currently cheat in school work
____ have used alcohol or illegal drugs in the past
____ currently use alcohol or drugs
____ have engaged in petting
____ have experienced sexual intercourse
____ tend to be racist or snobbish
____ have an adequate sense of future direction



7. What percentage of young people active in your Sunday School or youth group:

____ attend church or a religious function once a week
____ have a job
____ have cheated in the past on school work
____ currently cheat in school work
____ have used alcohol or illegal drugs in the past
____ currently use alcohol or drugs
____ have engaged in petting
____ have experienced sexual intercourse
____ tend to be racist or snobbish
____ have an adequate sense of future direction



8. My children are more comfortable discussing sensitive issues

a) with their father
b) with their mother



9. My children are more comfortable discussing sensitive issues

a) with their parents
b) with another adult friend



10. My children would more likely discuss a sensitive issue

a) with their parents
b) with a friend (peer)



11. My children would most likely discuss a sensitive issue

a) with a pastor or priest
b) with a youth leader



12. What I most want for my children at this stage of their life is______________________________

13. What I would hope the church could give my children at this point in their lives is______________________

Your gender____ City or town________ State____ Country____

Denomination________ Date of this survey________

Thanks so much!

Dean Borgman cCYS

Podcasts

Sermons Podcast

Sermons Podcast

MP3:      Podcast    RSS Feed

Volunteer Opportunities: Churches

Title Organization Name City, State/Country
Managua, Nicaragua Short Term Mission Forward Edge International
Managua
Nicaragua
Puerto Cabezas, Nicaragua Short Term Mission Forward Edge International
Puerto Cabezas, WA
Nicaragua
New Orleans, Louisiana Short Term Mission Forward Edge International
New Orleans, LA
United States
Houston, Texas Short Term Mission Forward Edge International
Houston, TX
United States
Short Term Mission Groups Christian Commission for Development
Tegucigalpa
Honduras
City Vision Intern- Driver Intern City Vision
Joliet, IL
United States
Crow Agency, Montana Short Term Mission Forward Edge International
Crow Agency, MT
United States
Oaxaca City, Oaxaca, Mexico Short Term Mission Trip Forward Edge International
Oaxaca City
Mexico
Juarez, Mexico Short Term Mission Forward Edge International
Juarez
Mexico
The Sierra Tarahumara Mountains, Mexico Forward Edge International
Tarahumara Mountains
Mexico
Title Organization Name
Virtual Opportunity: Help us upload resources to our website, UrbanMinistry.org Techmission Corps
Filmmaker needed Techmission Corps
Pen Pal Christian Pen Pals
volunteer Tape Ministries Northwest
Video Editor-Development City Union Mission
Multi-Media Web Developer City Union Mission
Prayer Partner- Community Relations City Union Mission
Videographer City Union Mission
Writer and Editor City Union Mission
News Letter Intern Freedom House Ministries
Postal Code

Widgets

Social Justice Quote of the Day Widget

Social Justice Quote of the Day

 

Leer más

Audio: Churches